Press statement of Save Malaysia Stop Lynas (SMSL)
SMSL
Appeals against the Lynas Temporary Operating Licence (TOL)
12th Nov
2012
Since
last Thursday 8th
November, the Kuantan High Court has lifted the interim suspension of
the Temporary Operating License for Lynas.
Justice
Mariana Yahya was
of the opinion that the possible irreversible and irreparable harms
on environment, livelihoods, health and safety of the people living
around LAMP as submitted by our counsel is PREMATURE!
Mr
Tan Bun Teet, an applicant to
revoke the TOL and a spokesperson for SMSL says “Radiation
and hazardous substances are not something one should trifle with.
Lynas will be producing a massive amount of toxic wastes. It has no
safe plan to dispose of these wastes. No responsible government
would have approved of such a project, let alone issuing a TOL to put
the country and the people at risk.”
Ionizing
radiation, at sufficient doses, can increase the risk of many cancers
aside from lung cancer, and it has been classified by the
International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC, www.iarc.org) as a
Group 1 carcinogen, i.e., a known carcinogenic risk. The three major
types of ionizing radiation are alpha particles, beta particles, and
gamma rays which will be found at the Lynas plant and in its wastes.
The
counsel acting for SMSL has filed a formal application for an
interlocutory interim
stay or another
interim suspension on the TOL at the High Court of Kuantan last
Friday 9th
Nov and now it is scheduled for hearing on Wednesday 14th
Nov 2012.
Haji
Ismail Abu Bakar, one of the other applicants to revoke the ToL
comments, “We are disappointed that the court’s decision on the
TOL did not give due attention to the possible harms that can ensue
once the LAMP starts to operate. We have been informed by highly
qualified and skilled independent experts that Lynas has no safe
radioactive waste management plan and there are serious risk and
hazards for workers which have not been identified by Lynas.”
SMSL
asserts that the court has neglected to take into consideration that
the two Judicial review cases are aimed at nullifying the approval of
the TOL. If these cases succeed, the TOL now granted to Lynas will no
longer be legally valid nor useful.!
“We
aim to convince the court in our appeal that precaution is essential.
It is within the court’s jurisdiction and power to take
precautionary steps necessary to prevent the harms from materialising
and it should be applied to our case.” Ram Punusamy, a local
resident active in the Stop Lynas campaign explains.
Lynas’
proposal to ship the wastes out of Malaysia and its proposal to
recycle the radioactive and hazardous waste are both unworkable.
Recycling radioactive waste will spread the radioactive exposure to
more people, out of the control of any authority. Australia has a
policy in place to ban any importation of radioactive and toxic waste
from another country. See attached official record stating this.
“We
hereby call upon all residents of Kuantan and greater Kuantan to come
forward to do something to protect your family, investment and your
future in Kuantan. Show your concern by attending the court hearing
on Wednesday 14th
at the Kuantan High Court.” Mr Tan appeals to supporters of the
Stop Lynas campaign.
“The
AELB should have taken steps to clean up the Bukit Merah mess
completely. It has not done so and now it has approved another plant
at least ten times bigger with many more times wastes in Kuantan.
The choice is in citizens’ hand to prevent a repeat of another sad
tragedy due to government’s neglect! Stop it now before it is too
late…” concludes Mr Tan


All you do is LIE to the people of Kuantan & Pahang. One day your TREASON will be exposed, as have the lies of Fuziah Salleh after the royal family intervened. You propagate misinformation purposely to scare the rakyat... and very soon you will be paraded for the LIARS YOU ARE... Tudiah Lynas!
ReplyDeleteInteresting article.
ReplyDeleteSMSL continue to say their experts has says this and said that. But who are the experts they speak of?
This article mentions ionizing radiation, this is everywhere around us. You can easily measure this.
The issue for any type of process using ionizing radiation, i.e. in tin mining, in hospitals, in universities, even in smoke alarms, is that of time weighted exposure.
The ACTUAL experts are from the IAEA and AELB. These internationally recognized organizations have applied the SAME RULES AND PROCESS AND PROCEDURES to Lynas that are applied to any other industry.
Therefore, any further action by the discredited SMSL will need to prove the REAL EXPERTS wrong.
They can't do this so get use to losing.
Above article contains many lies.
ReplyDeleteHere is a classic SMSL misrepresentation of the truth....
Bukit Merah waste is 60 times more hazardous than lynas material. Bukit Merah waste is from Malaysian tin mining.
Bukit Merah waste was illegally dumped into the rivers, swamps and even was allowed to fall off on the roadsides next to children.
The waste at Bukit Merah was handled by local Malaysian contractors.
Hopefully this credible information that anyone can verify helps discredited these SMSL LIARS further.
Live by the sword, die by the sword
Live by lies, lies will be your downfall
www.Itcourses-distancelearning.com
ReplyDeleteclick here
National institute is the largest leading chain of skill based hands-on line -training providers for Vast Rang of
v Safety Officer/safety Engineer course
v Hotel management course
v Air Line Ticketing course
v Cabin Crew Air Hostess course
v Seo Search Engine Optimization course
v spoken English course
v Call center training course
v Web Development course
Technical Vocational
Training Courses Pakistan and All over the World. Its Educational Heritage Can Be Traced Since 2007. National Institute has always led the market by introducing latest market driven IT, linguistics and online Courses. National institute is a trusted name in the field of on line education and training having the largest chain of institutions in the on line worldwide. National institute has a large group of happy &satisfied students attaining successes in their future lives & prospects.
click here
When this article says exportation or recyling are not acceptable then this makes clear they are not interested in protecting people, they are only interested in causing a fight, not find a safe solution.
ReplyDeleteAlso they say that the Australian Government has a policy to ban any radioactive waste and the author is foolish enough to include a letter if you read it tthat does not support this statement.
Do your homework before donating or buying t-shirts.